TL;DR: Immutable objects can’t be changed after creation. In C#, this can make your code safer, easier to test, and bug-resistant, especially in multithreaded or async scenarios.
Have you ever had a bug where some object mysteriously changed its value? Or spent hours debugging a weird race condition? Immutability might be the solution you need.
In simple terms, immutable objects can’t be changed after they’re created. Instead of modifying an existing object, you create a new one with the updated values. It’s like the difference between editing a document and making a new copy with your changes.
This might seem inefficient at first glance, but it actually solves a ton of headaches in your code. Let me show you why I’ve come to love immutability in my C# projects.
What Makes Something Immutable in C#?
An object is immutable when:
- Its fields can’t change (using the
readonly
keyword) - Its properties only have getters, no setters
- It doesn’t expose any ways to change its internal state
- It makes copies of any mutable objects it needs to store
Here’s the cool part, immutable objects bring five major benefits that can make your code dramatically better.
1. Thread Safety Without All the Locks
The biggest win with immutable objects? They’re automatically thread-safe. No locks, no Mutexes, no Semaphores, no headaches.
Think about it, if something can’t change, you don’t need to worry about two threads trying to update it at the same time. It’s like having multiple people read the same book instead of trying to edit a shared Google Doc.
A Real Example with Collections
I used to write a ton of complex lock statements until I discovered C#’s immutable collections:
using System;
using System.Collections.Immutable;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
public class ThreadSafetyDemo
{
public static void Main()
{
// Just a simple immutable array
var numbers = ImmutableArray.Create(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
// Look Ma, no locks!
Parallel.For(0, 100, i =>
{
// Any thread can read the array safely
var sum = 0;
foreach (var num in numbers)
{
sum += num;
}
Console.WriteLine($"Thread {Task.CurrentId} calculated sum: {sum}");
// Need to "change" something? You get a new copy
var myThreadCopy = numbers.Add(i);
Console.WriteLine($"Thread {Task.CurrentId} added: {myThreadCopy[myThreadCopy.Length - 1]}");
});
// Our original array is untouched
Console.WriteLine($"Original array still has {numbers.Length} elements");
}
}
2. No More “Who Changed My Object?” Moments
Have you ever spent hours debugging only to find that some function changed an object you didn’t expect? These “action at a distance” bugs are maddening, and immutability kills them dead.
When your objects can’t change after creation, you can pass them anywhere without worry. No more defensive copying or paranoid code reviews.
The Tale of Two Approaches
Let’s look at how mutable and immutable code behave in the real world:
The Traditional Mutable Way (Danger Zone)
public class UserProfile
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public int Age { get; set; }
public List<string> Permissions { get; set; } = new List<string>();
}
public class SecurityService
{
public static void ValidateAndProcessUser(UserProfile user)
{
// This silently changes the user object!
if (user.Age >= 18)
{
user.Permissions.Add("BasicAccess");
}
}
}
// Somewhere else in your code
public void ProcessUserRequest(UserProfile user)
{
// Did this change something? Who knows!
SecurityService.ValidateAndProcessUser(user);
// Surprise! The user's permissions might have changed
if (!user.Permissions.Contains("BasicAccess"))
{
// Good luck figuring out if this runs or not without tracing the code
}
}
The Immutable Way (Peace of Mind)
public sealed class UserProfile
{
public string Name { get; }
public int Age { get; }
public ImmutableList<string> Permissions { get; }
public UserProfile(string name, int age, ImmutableList<string> permissions)
{
Name = name;
Age = age;
Permissions = permissions ?? ImmutableList<string>.Empty;
}
// Need to add a permission? Get a new profile
public UserProfile WithPermission(string permission)
{
return new UserProfile(
Name,
Age,
Permissions.Add(permission)
);
}
}
public class SecurityService
{
public static UserProfile ValidateAndProcessUser(UserProfile user)
{
// Changes are explicit and returned as a new object
if (user.Age >= 18)
{
return user.WithPermission("BasicAccess");
}
return user;
}
}
// Somewhere else in your code
public void ProcessUserRequest(UserProfile user)
{
// Crystal clear, we get back a potentially different object
UserProfile processedUser = SecurityService.ValidateAndProcessUser(user);
// No surprises here, we know exactly what we're checking
if (!processedUser.Permissions.Contains("BasicAccess"))
{
// Now we can reason about this code
}
}
With immutable objects, nothing happens behind your back. Changes are always front and center, returned as new values. It’s like the difference between someone secretly editing your paper versus handing you a marked-up copy.
3. Surprise! Immutability Can Actually Be Faster
I know what you’re thinking: “Creating new objects all the time must kill performance!” That’s what I thought too, but it turns out immutability can actually speed things up in many common scenarios.
Share Without Fear
With immutable objects, there’s no need for defensive copying when passing data around:
public class ConfigManager
{
private readonly ImmutableDictionary<string, string> _settings;
public ConfigManager(ImmutableDictionary<string, string> settings)
{
// No need to make a copy -> it can't be changed anyway
_settings = settings;
}
public ImmutableDictionary<string, string> GetSettings()
{
// Safe to return the actual instance -> nothing can mess it up
return _settings;
}
}
Clever Memory Tricks
Modern immutable collections use a technique called “structural sharing” that’s pretty clever. When you “change” something, the new version shares most of its memory with the original:
var original = ImmutableDictionary<string, int>.Empty
.Add("one", 1)
.Add("two", 2)
.Add("three", 3);
// This doesn't copy the whole dictionary -> just the changed part
var modified = original.SetItem("two", 22);
// Both versions work exactly as you'd expect
Console.WriteLine(original["two"]); // 2
Console.WriteLine(modified["two"]); // 22
Caching That Actually Works
Immutability makes caching simple and reliable:
public class DataProcessor
{
private readonly Dictionary<string, ImmutableList<Result>> _cache
= new Dictionary<string, ImmutableList<Result>>();
public ImmutableList<Result> ProcessData(string key, ImmutableList<DataPoint> data)
{
// Safe caching with no worries about someone changing the cached results
if (_cache.TryGetValue(key, out var results))
{
return results;
}
// Process and cache
var newResults = DoExpensiveCalculation(data);
_cache[key] = newResults;
return newResults;
}
}
4. Debugging That Doesn’t Make You Pull Your Hair Out
Ever stepped through code in the debugger, only to find that the object you’re tracking suddenly changed somewhere else? With immutable objects, what you see is what you get, forever.
Clear Logs and Meaningful Stack Traces
Following the flow of operations becomes much clearer:
public void ProcessOrder(Order order)
{
try
{
// Each step produces a new state that's easy to track
var validated = _validator.Validate(order);
var priced = _pricingService.CalculateTotals(validated);
var processed = _paymentProcessor.Process(priced);
var completed = _fulfillmentService.Schedule(processed);
// We know exactly what state we're logging
_logger.LogInfo($"Order {completed.Id} processed successfully");
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// The original order is still intact for troubleshooting
_logger.LogError($"Failed to process order {order.Id}: {ex.Message}");
// No need to worry if something changed the order during processing
}
}
5. Tests That Actually Test What You Think They Test
I’ve found that immutability completely transforms testing. No more flaky tests caused by state leaking between test cases or objects changing unexpectedly during the test.
Rock-Solid Test Setups
Your test objects stay exactly as you created them:
[Fact]
public void PremiumCustomer_Gets20PercentDiscount()
{
// Arrange
var customer = new Customer("John", CustomerTier.Premium, 5);
var order = new Order(
id: "12345",
items: ImmutableList.Create(
new OrderItem("Product1", 100.0m, 2),
new OrderItem("Product2", 50.0m, 1)
),
customer: customer
);
// Act
var discountedOrder = _discountService.ApplyDiscounts(order);
// Assert
Assert.Equal(200.0m, order.Subtotal); // Still exactly what we created
Assert.Equal(160.0m, discountedOrder.Subtotal); // New object with the discount
}
Test Data That Stays Put
You can reuse test data without worrying about side effects:
[Theory]
[InlineData(CustomerTier.Regular, 0)]
[InlineData(CustomerTier.Gold, 10)]
[InlineData(CustomerTier.Premium, 20)]
public void Discount_Varies_By_CustomerTier(
CustomerTier tier, int expectedDiscountPercentage)
{
// This test customer won't change between test runs
var customer = new Customer("Test", tier, 1);
// Act
var discount = _discountCalculator.GetDiscountPercentage(customer);
// Assert
Assert.Equal(expectedDiscountPercentage, discount);
}
Should You Make Everything Immutable?
I don’t want to oversell immutability, it’s not a silver bullet for everything. But after years of dealing with complex C# codebases, I’ve found these guidelines helpful:
Immutability makes the most sense when you’re:
- Building anything with multiple threads or async code
- Sharing data between different parts of your application
- Creating DTOs or value objects
- Trying to squash hard-to-reproduce bugs
- Writing code that needs rock-solid tests
The good news is that modern C# makes immutability much easier:
- C# 9’s
record
types are immutable by default - The
with
keyword lets you create modified copies effortlessly System.Collections.Immutable
gives you ready-made collectionsreadonly
structs protect value types- Init-only properties give you immutability with less boilerplate
Give immutability a try in your next project. You might be surprised at how many bugs and headaches simply disappear when your objects stop changing behind your back.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does immutability mean in C#?
How does immutability improve thread safety?
Does using immutable objects hurt performance?
What’s the difference between C# records and regular immutable classes?
How do you handle complex state changes with immutable objects?
When should I NOT use immutability in my C# code?
Related Posts
- C# Abstract Class vs Interface: 10 Real-World Questions You Should Ask
- Prefer Interfaces Over Abstract Classes in C#: Build Flexible, Testable, and Maintainable Code
- Polymorphism in C#: How Template Method, Strategy, and Visitor Patterns Make Your Code Flexible
- Avoiding Boxing with Struct Dictionary Keys in C#: Performance and Best Practices
- Why Dependency Inversion Improves C# Code Quality